Unemployment “May Rise”….Ya think??…President Obama By The Numbers Part 4

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-01-13/fed-s-evans-says-policy-risks-errors-of-japan-great-depression.html

It is something of a pattern. The unemployment figures come out and then they get revised – usually in the wrong direction. Some feel this is an intentional effort to create a perception of improement l that is not to be derailed by facts. As part of the purported campaign, cautionary remarks about the figures, a sort of bet-hedging come out a day or two after the reports, before the downward revisions.

So, there was speculation that happy days are around the bend after the jobless rate “fell” to 8.5 percent. I blogged two rather caustic responses to the chorus. Now comes this sober piece that says unemployment will probably go back up.

Herewith are some comments from the recent opinion piece skewering the current administration’s policies. I think perspective is in these quotes:

“Unemployment actually rose after June, 2009, and did not fall back down below that level until 18 months later in December, 2010.  Instead of a recovery, America has suffered the longest period of unemployment near 9% or above since the Great Depression, under President Obama’s public policy malpractice.  Even today, 49 months after the recession started, the U6 unemployment rate counting the unemployed, underemployed and discouraged workers is still 15.2%.  And that doesn’t include all the workers who have fled the workforce under Obama’s economic oppression.  The unemployment rate with the full measure of discouraged workers is reported at www.shadowstats.com as about 23%, which is depression level unemployment.

Today, over 4 years since the recession started, there are still almost 25 million Americans unemployed or underemployed.  That includes 5.6 million who are long-term unemployed for 27 weeks, or more than 6 months.  Under President Obama, America has suffered the longest period with so many in such long-term unemployment since the Great Depression.

Notably, blacks have been suffering another depression under Obama, with unemployment today, 49 months after the recession started, still at 15.8%. Black unemployment has been over 15% for 2 ½ years under Obama.  Black teenage unemployment today is over 40%, where it has persisted for over 2 years as well.

Hispanics have also been suffering a depression under Obama, with unemployment today still in double digits at 11%.  Hispanic unemployment has been in double digits for three years under President Obama.  Over one fourth of Hispanic youths remain unemployed today, which also has persisted for years.

The Census Bureau reported in September that more Americans are in poverty today than at any time in the entire history of Census tracking poverty. Americans dependent on food stamps are at an all time high as well.

Real wages and incomes have been falling so steadily under Obama and his confused, throwback, Keynesian/neo-Marxist Obamanomics, that the Census Bureau also reported that real median family income in America has fallen all the way back to 1996 levels.

Obama apologists cannot argue that this is because the recession was so bad, because the historical record in America is the worse the recession the stronger the recovery.  Based on historical precedent, we should at worst be finishing the second year of a booming recovery by now.”

In my last comments on this issue I remarked about the “perfect storm” of economic trouble the administration seems bent on creating. Here is a little more on that:

“But by 2013 these regulatory costs will have exploded in unprecedented fashion.  That reflects the Obama Administration’s global warming crusade, assault on private energy production, the still oncoming Dodd-Frank regulatory burdens on the financial community, Obamacare regulations, particularly the job killing employer mandate, and many others.

By 2013, the Fed may be in contractionary mode as well.  If history is any guide, the Fed might decide that right after the election would be the perfect time to cut back on its historically loose monetary policy with record low interest rates that have persisted for years.  Adding rising interest rates to the above brew of soaring marginal tax rates across the board and exploding regulatory costs would accumulate to a powerful contractionary force.

Art Laffer predicted the Coming Crash of 2011 on the basis of the expiration of the Bush tax cuts on the upper income earners alone.  Those tax rate increases were extended to 2013 in December, 2010 out of fear that prediction was right.  But now in 2013 in addition to those tax rate increases we have all of the tax increases of Obamacare, the further exploding costs of Obama’s building regulatory blizzard, and the possible contractionary effect of the Fed’s monetary policies, all at the same time.  Unless we reverse course, the result may well be one big, bad crash in 2013.

Adding that on top of Obama’s first term, the entire period will look like an historical reenactment of the 1930s.  Unless the American people choose to change leadership this year, we will have achieved that result the old fashioned way – we will have earned it.”

With the spending, over-regulation, tax increases, inflation and refusal to develop sane energy policy much higher unemployment is really inevitable.

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Economic Forecasts. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Unemployment “May Rise”….Ya think??…President Obama By The Numbers Part 4

  1. It seems to me they would like the obama administration to fail in handling the troubled economy.

    I think i remember during the election democrats were talking about the recession while republicans were ignoring it Limbaugh said he wasn’t participating in the recession.

    An McCain adviser said during the election “If They talk anymore about the economy were going to lose the election” which they did in the end anyway.

    Now that obama is president they want to talk about the recession endlessly and talk about how the economy will get worse unemployment will rise and were all socialist now.

    • Hi Deanne

      I think you are showing some selective memory here. As usual during the election season the out of power party was claiming the economy was bad and the in-power said the economy was good. Both were wrong because the economy was flawed in 2008. McCain lost the election because he lost his head when the collapse of 2008 happened. He was leading fairly comfortably until that moment. If you don’t think both parties were talking about the recession during the fall you are sadly mistaken. The real issue is that three years into the administration that was going to “focus like a laser” on the economy and fix it, we aren’t fixed. You also need to remind yourself that President Obama himself said that if he didn’t fix the economy in one term he didn’t deserve a second. I don’t think he deserved a first term but that is my opinion.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s